It was June 2022. Princess Lilibet was turning one. The Platinum Jubilee was in full swing. And for one afternoon, in a scene that should have been among the most moving in recent royal history, the youngest child of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle met her namesake, Queen Elizabeth II, for the first time. Lilibet Diana Sussex sat with the woman she was named after. The encounter was private. The cameras were not there. And that, according to fresh details emerging this week, was entirely by the late Queen's design. Harry and Meghan had asked to bring their own photographer. The Queen had, politely but unmistakably, said no.
.jpg)
The refusal is being revisited now because of what it reveals about the nature of the relationship in those final months before the Queen's death in September 2022. This was not a hostile response. The Queen adored her grandchildren. She was, by all accounts, genuinely delighted to meet Lilibet and charmed by Archie's formal manners. But the request to document the moment, to have a Sussex-approved photographer in the room for what would have been an extraordinarily marketable image, crossed a line the Palace had drawn clearly. These moments are not content. They are not assets. They are family. The distinction, between what the Sussexes believed they were entitled to record and what the late Monarch was prepared to allow, sits at the heart of everything that went wrong between the two camps.
Four years on, the photographs that weren't taken have taken on a different kind of weight. King Charles hasn't seen Archie and Lilibet in person for years. He told aides he doesn't want to be a grandfather "via Zoom." The children are growing up with striking red hair, the Spencer gene their father has always been proud of, photographed on beaches in California, away from the family network that their cousins in Windsor take entirely for granted. And a new private secretary, Theo Rycroft, has reportedly made healing this rift his personal mission. The moment the Queen prevented from being monetised is now the moment Harry most wishes he could recreate. This time without a photographer. Just the room. Just the family. Just the chance to be in the same country as the people he misses.
The Jubilee incident, June 2022
Harry and Meghan requested a private photographer to document Lilibet's first meeting with Queen Elizabeth II. The Queen "firmly" declined.
Palace insiders told the Mirror that the concern was explicit: any photographs would risk being "leaked to US television networks" to bolster the Sussexes' commercial profile. The Queen insisted it remain a private family meeting with no digital record. The meeting happened. The photographs did not.
What the Refusal Actually Said
Read the refusal charitably and it's a grandmother protecting a private family moment from the commercial pressures that had come to define her grandson's public life. The Queen understood, better than almost anyone alive, the difference between a family gathering and a content opportunity. She'd spent seven decades navigating exactly that distinction. The request to bring a Sussex photographer into the room collapsed that distinction entirely, and her response was to restore it. Firmly. Without public drama. As was her way.
Read it less charitably, and it's the Palace's institutional suspicion of Meghan expressing itself through one of the most emotionally loaded moments of the entire Sussex saga. A great-grandmother meeting her namesake great-grandchild for the first time, and the immediate question on the table was who controls the image. That the question even arose says something about how far trust between the two camps had eroded by June 2022. And the Queen's answer, whatever its motivation, landed on the Sussexes as a rebuff at a moment when they were already feeling the distance from everything they'd left behind.
June 2022: what was asked
A Sussex-approved private photographer in the room for Lilibet's first meeting with Queen Elizabeth II. A historic image. Potentially the most valuable single photograph in the Sussex commercial archive.
June 2022: what the Queen gave instead
A private family meeting. No photographer. No digital record. A grandmother meeting her great-grandchildren on her own terms, in the way she chose to manage every private royal moment: without a camera in the room.
What Harry Wrote: The "Bemused" Queen and the Children Who Surprised Her
👑 The "bemused" reaction
Harry writes in Spare that the Queen seemed genuinely surprised by Archie and Lilibet's behaviour. She had apparently expected them to be "more American," a phrase Harry interpreted as meaning "rambunctious." Instead she found something she didn't expect.
🎩 Archie's bow
Harry describes his son, then three years old, making "deep bows" to his great-grandmother. The detail is affecting: a small boy who has no institutional framework for any of this, apparently absorbing enough of his parents' world to understand that this particular woman was someone you showed deference to.
🤗 Lilibet and the shins
Harry writes that Lilibet, just turning one, "cuddled the monarch's shins." It's the kind of detail that makes the entire episode feel human and warm and desperately sad in retrospect. The Queen and her great-granddaughter. One meeting that we know of. No photographs to prove it happened.
"Harry wrote that the Queen seemed 'bemused' by the children, having expected them to be 'more American,' meaning rambunctious. Instead, Archie made 'deep bows' and Lilibet 'cuddled the monarch's shins.'"
Harry, Spare, as cited in Mirror reporting, May 2026
The Spare passage is one of the memoir's most genuinely touching moments, which is part of why it keeps resurfacing in 2026 coverage. It's unguarded in a way that most of the book isn't. Harry wasn't making a political argument in that paragraph. He was describing his grandmother meeting his children, and the pride in the writing is real. Archie bowing. Lilibet cuddling shins. The Queen, bemused, finding them gentler and more formal than she'd expected. It's the kind of scene that, if it had a photograph attached to it, would have been the defining Sussex image of the decade. The Queen, in refusing that photograph, didn't erase the moment. She preserved it as something only the people in the room would ever fully know.
The Spencer Gene: Archie and Lilibet in 2026
The red hair detail, May 2026
Meghan's birthday photos for Archie's 7th birthday, posted May 6, showed both Archie and Lilibet with striking red hair that royal watchers immediately described as the "Spencer gene" made visible. Harry has spoken previously about the strong Spencer colouring in his mother Princess Diana's family. The images were widely shared, partly as joyful birthday content and partly as a reminder of the physical link between the California-based Sussex children and the British royal family they've grown up largely apart from.
The ginger gene story has a particular resonance in 2026 because of what's been documented elsewhere this week. Harry is "very sad" that Archie and Lilibet aren't part of the "extensive family network" their cousins enjoy. King Charles doesn't want to be a grandfather via Zoom. The photographs of two red-haired children on a California beach are beautiful. They're also the most visible reminder that the Spencer colouring that traces directly to Diana, to Harry's mother, to the woman whose death shaped everything about who Harry is, is growing up thousands of miles from the family it came from. That's not just a PR detail. That's a grief that nobody in this story has fully reckoned with yet.
The Reconciliation Timeline: From Firm Refusals to Peace Envoys
June 2022
Queen firmly refuses photographer request at Lilibet's first birthday
The meeting happens. No images are taken. The Queen dies three months later in September 2022. The refusal becomes, in retrospect, one of the defining moments of the final Sussex-Queen relationship.
January 2023
Spare published. The details become public.
Harry's memoir describes the Jubilee meetings with the Queen in detail, including the children's behaviour and the warmth of the encounter, without referencing the photographer dispute directly.
Late 2024
Theo Rycroft appointed as King Charles's private secretary
Rycroft reportedly makes it his personal mission to heal the William-Harry rift and reduce the pain the ongoing estrangement is causing the King.
May 2026
Charles hasn't seen Archie and Lilibet in person for four years
Archie turns 7 in California. Lilibet is 4. Charles told aides he doesn't want to be a grandfather via Zoom. The gap between what he wants and what exists is the central personal tragedy of his reign's early years.
June/Summer 2026
Potential Sussex UK visit. Security concerns being resolved.
Harry and Meghan plan to return to the UK for the Invictus countdown. Whether Rycroft's peace mission finds any traction, and whether Archie and Lilibet come too, remains the defining question of the royal summer.
Theo Rycroft's Mission: The Peace Envoy Charles Needed
The man trying to fix this
King Charles's private secretary Theo Rycroft, appointed in late 2024, is reportedly making the William-Harry reconciliation his personal mission. The motivation isn't institutional tidiness. It's the King's genuine and documented grief over an estrangement that has kept him from his grandchildren and from any functional relationship with his younger son. Whether Rycroft has the leverage, the trust from both sides, and the political runway to make any real progress is unknown. But his existence as a named peace broker is itself a signal that the palace is treating this as a solvable problem rather than a permanent condition.
The challenge Rycroft faces is structural rather than personal. The William-Harry rift isn't a misunderstanding that a good conversation could clear up. It's a five-year accumulation of public statements, legal filings, published memoirs, and commercial decisions that have hardened positions on both sides to a degree that a private secretary, however skilled, can't simply smooth over with diplomatic goodwill. William's veto on private reunion, Catherine's reported patience expiry, the title threat if Harry keeps "merchandising" his royal connection: these aren't soft positions waiting for a nudge toward the centre. They're the outer edges of what the Wales camp is prepared to tolerate.
The Harry side has its own hardened positions. The security demand. The RAVEC case. The Australia tour. The As Ever brand. The suggestion that Meghan wants "to be Princess Meghan again" while the independent operation underperforms. None of these signal a camp that's ready to make significant concessions. Rycroft is trying to move two objects that are both, for different reasons, not particularly interested in moving. His mission is honourable. The odds are not straightforward.
The Missing Photographs and What They Represent in 2026
What the photograph would have shown
Queen Elizabeth II, in her Platinum Jubilee year, meeting her youngest great-grandchild. Lilibet Diana Sussex, named for her great-grandmother and her grandmother. A historic image of four generations. The kind of photograph that defines a family across decades.
What exists instead
Harry's written description in Spare. No official photographs. No Sussex-approved images. A private memory held only by the people in the room, most of whom are now separated by an ocean, a legal dispute, and four years of accumulated distance.
There is something almost unbearably poignant about the way this particular story sits in May 2026. The photograph that wasn't taken has become, in its absence, more powerful than it would ever have been had it existed. Had the Queen allowed the Sussex photographer in the room, the image would have been published, praised, dissected, and eventually filed away. Instead, the moment lives only in Harry's prose, in Archie's bow, in Lilibet cuddling her great-grandmother's shins. The Queen understood that some things are diminished by being recorded. This was one of them.
Harry is "very sad" that his children are missing out on the family network their cousins have. Charles doesn't want to be a grandfather via Zoom. Rycroft is trying to find a path through. The summer is coming. The June UK visit is planned. And somewhere in all of this, there is a four-year-old girl named for a Queen she barely remembers meeting, with red hair that traces directly to a woman she never knew at all, growing up in California wondering, in whatever way a four-year-old wonders, what England is and why they don't go there. That's the photograph that still doesn't exist. And it's the one that matters most.